Naked Capitalism: Banksters, Part II

Former CFTC Commissioner Michael Greenberger: “We’re Going to Be Back Where We Were in 2008″

Posted on February 10, 2015 by

This interview with former CFTC Commissioner Michael Greenberger provides useful detail on why financial reform proved to be so weak. Some of it, predictably, is that Obama has consistently put Wall-Street-friendly candidates in key regulatory positions. As Greenberger points out, Gary Gensler unexpectedly switched allegiance.

That likely comes as no news. But what may surprise readers is Greenberger’s assessment that Dodd Frank was actually a pretty decent bill, but was substantially watered-down by extremely aggressive and effective lobbying in the rulemaking phase. Here I have to quibble a bit, since Dodd Frank punted on far more issues than is typical for a bill, kicking many over to a year or two of studies, or delayed implementation, which give the financiers another bite at the apple.

From the summary of this talk with Marshall Auerback at the INET website:

Proprietary trading by Wall Street banks precipitated the 2008 financial crisis that resulted in a near 13 trillion dollar bailout by American taxpayers of Too Big To Fail financial institutions. As early as 2007, Morgan Stanley lost $9 billion dollars due to bullish bets on complex derivatives related to mortgages and in 2008 American International Group famously lost billions of dollars betting on complex derivatives. Similarly, toward the end of 2008, Merrill Lynch lost nearly $16 billion and Deutsche Bank lost nearly $2 billion due to complex bets on risky securities. Additionally, JPMorgan’s $9 billion loss on a giant derivatives trade made by its London trading desk known colloquially as the London Whale is a stark reminder that proprietary trading by Too Big To Fail financial institutions poses an acute risk to U.S. financial markets and exposes U.S. taxpayers to the risk of future bank bailouts.

The whole rationale for what ultimately became known as the “Dodd-Frank” bill was to prevent a recurrence of the 2008 crisis. Has it served its purpose? No, according to Michael Greenberger, a Professor at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, and a former top official with the Division of Trading and Markets at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) working directly for then-Chairperson Brooksley Born. He focused on issues relating to financial regulation and derivatives.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s